Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Biological Value of your Protein  (Read 22008 times)
Boyar
Bulking Gnome
***

Reputation Power: 5
Boyar is starting out.
Posts: 980


the dude abides.

  • Awards Given for excellent postings explaining ideas and concepts. Given for tirelessly and competently discussing and answering questions. Given for elaborate and detailed advice.

  • View Profile Awards
    « on: September 18, 2010, 08:35:45 AM »

    I would like to discuss the concept of ‘Biological Value’ this is something that is very simple, but very misunderstood or just receives little attention around the forum. As a first thought you may think it is the nutritional facts of a certain food, or how much it is worth in nutritional value. In part, you are most certainly right, but it is more closely associated with protein, protein quality specifically.

    _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ ____________

    Biological value is the amount, or percentage of protein that the body is able to absorb and use from a certain protein source. To simply put it; protein in certain foods is worth more than in others. A protein from a certain food will be absorbed better than a protein from a different food source, even if both are given in the same quantity, protein-wise.

    Before I go further, I would like to explain what a ‘protein’ macronutrient is, in the language of science. Protein is a sequence of amino acids; a different sequence represents a different protein type, or function. Every amino acid is also constructed from a different sequence of atoms. These amino acids are all linked together by a series of peptide bonds when a protein is a whole molecule (before it is broken up, by enzymes for example) All protein kinds contain nitrogen, this nitrogen is very crucial for biological value as well as metabolism and other bodily functions such as the growth of; fingernails, hair, ligaments, and muscles.

    Depending on the biological value of the foods you eat, the more nitrogen your body will also be able to retain, or excrete in the form of urea (urine) which also assists in the removal of many toxic materials from your body. Nitrogen accumulation also assists in the buildup of enzymes, or a special type of protein which help your body break down food by acting as a catalyst in the metabolic process (speeding it up), which in turn helps your metabolism. Now don’t think that you should eat nitrogen or something, every protein source you eat contains enough of it, it just varies how much of it will actually be utilized.

    As you can tell, nitrogen and biological value are closely linked to one another and that is because nitrogen is used to measure the biological value of the food. Biological value is measured by the amount of nitrogen initially present in a protein source, and the amount of nitrogen that ends up being excreted. The amount that remains, percentage, is the amount that will be used to construct bodily tissues. However, this is not always the most accurate method to measure biological value and can range between individuals depending on gender, age, and physique.  It is also important to note that athletes (body builders included) require a higher amount of protein due to the stress, and higher metabolic rate that the body undergoes due to training.

    _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ ____________

    All protein is ranked according to its biological value. When this system of ‘ranking’ protein was introduced, eggs were initially given the highest ranking of 100, because they are the most bio-available protein. Due to the high quality of egg protein all other protein sources were compared to it, and ranked upon a 0 to 100 scale (100 being highest, 0 lowest)

    After a certain period of time, whey, isolated from milk, was discovered. Whey protein had a higher biological value than egg protein and due to this a new way to measure the biological value of protein was necessary. The new system was a percentage based system, which measured the amount of nitrogen remaining in the body after excretion, which is what I explained above.

    Hopefully that somewhat explains what biological value is and how it is measured.

    _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ ____________

    I would also like to provide a biological value list of foods that are common in most diets. Here it is;
    Whey – 100
    Whole Egg – 100
    Cow’s Milk – 91
    Egg White – 88
    Fish – 83
    Beef – 80
    Casein – 80
    Chicken – 79
    Soy – 74
    Wheat Gluten – 64
    Rice – 59
    Wheat – 54
    Beans – 49

    As you can tell, whey protein, eggs, dairy and meat products have the highest biological value. These values are based upon a percentage system, meaning that these numbers represent the percentage of nitrogen absorbed.

    The reason I wrote this thread is to try to explain that when measuring protein consumption, your body doesn’t absorb all of it. Meaning that if, let’s say a 150lbs bodybuilder eats 150g protein a day, maybe only 120g will be used and absorbed by the body. The other 30g will be excreted or used for other bodily functions. I know it can be very time demanding to measure the amount of protein that your body is most likely to absorb, using the biological value system, but it should be put under consideration at least when measuring protein consumption.

    Something else that I think is important to note it that it is suggested that after waking up or after a workout, both catabolic states, it is best to consume a high biological valued protein. It is ideal due to the ability of protein to reach the muscles for optimum results. That is why many bodybuilders, including myself, would advise to have a protein shake. Of course you can eat a can of tuna, or a few glasses of milk as well, but the whey will reach your muscles faster than any other food source.

    _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ ____________



    Works Cited

    Neil A. Campbell, Jane B. Reece, Lisa A. Uray, Michael L. Cain, Steven A. Wasseman, Peter V. Minorsky, Robert B. Jackson “Biology, 8th Edition” : 77-86, 214-215, 325-350. Thur. 16 Sept. 2010.

    Behar, Jeff. “Methods of Assessing Protein Quality” Bodybuilding.com. Fri. 17 Sept. 2010. http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/protein3.htm
    Logged

    How to thank people for helpful posts? Give them reputation!
    1) Click the "blue heart" icon under their name/avatar.
    2) Select "Agree"
    3) Hit enter
    canadianguy
    Global Moderator
    Hypergnome
    *****

    Reputation Power: 33
    canadianguy is a rising star!canadianguy is a rising star!canadianguy is a rising star!canadianguy is a rising star!canadianguy is a rising star!canadianguy is a rising star!
    Posts: 9525


    Good Day eh!


    View Profile WWW Awards
    « Reply #1 on: September 18, 2010, 08:50:39 AM »

    good job.  Just one point to add BV values are good but getting protein for different sources will also maximize nutrients.  IE do not eat teh same thing all day.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by canadianguy » Logged

    bsone13
    Regular Gnome
    **

    Reputation Power: 0
    bsone13 is starting out.
    Posts: 200


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #2 on: September 18, 2010, 08:58:03 AM »

    I only read like half of it. but +karma.

    Logged
    benchfordeath
    Übergnome
    ****

    Reputation Power: 10
    benchfordeath has been heard.benchfordeath has been heard.
    Posts: 2622


    Genus: Genius

  • Awards Given for excellent postings explaining ideas and concepts.

  • View Profile Awards
    « Reply #3 on: September 18, 2010, 09:09:21 AM »

    excellent post +rep
    Logged

    HerrKaputt
    Global Moderator
    Übergnome
    *****

    Reputation Power: 16
    HerrKaputt is going up.HerrKaputt is going up.HerrKaputt is going up.
    Posts: 4455



    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #4 on: September 18, 2010, 09:49:35 AM »

    Good post. I'll add that this does NOT mean you should aim to ABSORB 0.5 g protein / 1 lb of bodyweight (or whichever rule you decide to use). You should still EAT according to that rule and let your body absorb what it decides to absorb.
    Logged

    Evilcyber
    Sr. Gnome
    Hypergnome
    *

    Reputation Power: 49
    Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!Evilcyber has power!
    Posts: 5925


  • Awards Given for elaborate and detailed advice. Given for excellent postings explaining ideas and concepts. Given for tirelessly and competently discussing and answering questions.

  • View Profile Awards
    « Reply #5 on: September 18, 2010, 11:01:10 AM »

    Very well written, Boyar!
    Logged

    JKman89
    Regular Gnome
    **

    Reputation Power: 1
    JKman89 is starting out.
    Posts: 149



    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #6 on: September 18, 2010, 12:54:58 PM »

    Excellent post! Not something I've looked too much into myself to be honest so I'm glad to have learned a bit about it.

    +Rep!
    Logged
    ConnorQ
    Quinoa Loving
    Regular Gnome
    **

    Reputation Power: 1
    ConnorQ is starting out.
    Posts: 234


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #7 on: September 25, 2010, 12:41:32 PM »

    Excellent post +rep
    Logged

    People judge books by their cover, so why not have a great cover?
    TomH
    Regular Gnome
    **

    Reputation Power: 1
    TomH is starting out.
    Posts: 482



    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #8 on: February 17, 2011, 01:09:45 PM »

    great post, +rep Cheesy

    Logged
    Thoughtless
    Applying Gnome


    Reputation Power: 1
    Thoughtless is starting out.
    Posts: 15


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #9 on: February 17, 2011, 11:23:19 PM »

    Good post. I'll add that this does NOT mean you should aim to ABSORB 0.5 g protein / 1 lb of bodyweight (or whichever rule you decide to use). You should still EAT according to that rule and let your body absorb what it decides to absorb.

    You don't think this knowledge should be applied somehow? If someone decides he needs for example 30g of protein per meal, if he goes for a meal of whole eggs he will get 30g, as much as he intended, but if he goes for a meal of beans, as many as to reach 30g of protein, he will only get a half. So shouldn't people count proteins that can be absorbed instead of just proteins? And if the previous rule doesn't stand anymore then a new one should be made, a better one.
    Logged
    CombatRaptor
    Master Troll
    Übergnome
    ****

    Reputation Power: 8
    CombatRaptor is starting out.
    Posts: 1286


    Triumphant victory when you bring the STEEL 2 life


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #10 on: June 15, 2011, 04:09:53 PM »

    Interesting, very interesting indeed. Its weird that my protein powder, though, apparently has a biological value of 104. Whats up with that? Also, aren't there other factors that also come into play in terms of protein efficacy? Such as "Protein Digestibility", "Protein Efficiency ratio", "Net protein utilization", and "PDCAAS (Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score)"? I'm guessing from context that the Biological Value of the protein is the most important of all though?

    Haha sorry I'm pretty clueless about this, I never really gave too much thought to this kind of thing Tongue
    Logged

    We forge our bodies in the fire of our will
    HerrKaputt
    Global Moderator
    Übergnome
    *****

    Reputation Power: 16
    HerrKaputt is going up.HerrKaputt is going up.HerrKaputt is going up.
    Posts: 4455



    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #11 on: June 16, 2011, 03:13:28 AM »

    Good post. I'll add that this does NOT mean you should aim to ABSORB 0.5 g protein / 1 lb of bodyweight (or whichever rule you decide to use). You should still EAT according to that rule and let your body absorb what it decides to absorb.

    You don't think this knowledge should be applied somehow? If someone decides he needs for example 30g of protein per meal, if he goes for a meal of whole eggs he will get 30g, as much as he intended, but if he goes for a meal of beans, as many as to reach 30g of protein, he will only get a half. So shouldn't people count proteins that can be absorbed instead of just proteins? And if the previous rule doesn't stand anymore then a new one should be made, a better one.

    Of course it should be applied. The thing is, when sports nutritionists recommend a rule of X grams of protein per pound of bodyweight, they already take these phenomena into account. Since beans, rice etc are rarely used as primary protein source, the main sources are always above 74 (soy, if you are a vegetarian) and most likely 79 (if you are not). This is a factor of 20% which isn't that big, so you can start off at that rule and make adjustments as you go.
    Logged

    ahm3d_12
    Applying Gnome


    Reputation Power: 1
    ahm3d_12 is starting out.
    Posts: 29


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #12 on: August 20, 2011, 12:09:54 AM »

    Great post mate!
    Logged
    Rani3110
    Übergnome
    ****

    Reputation Power: 8
    Rani3110 is starting out.
    Posts: 1469


    PubMed Junkie

  • Awards Given for excellent postings explaining ideas and concepts.

  • View Profile Awards
    « Reply #13 on: August 20, 2011, 12:47:14 AM »

    Interesting, very interesting indeed. Its weird that my protein powder, though, apparently has a biological value of 104. Whats up with that? Also, aren't there other factors that also come into play in terms of protein efficacy? Such as "Protein Digestibility", "Protein Efficiency ratio", "Net protein utilization", and "PDCAAS (Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score)"? I'm guessing from context that the Biological Value of the protein is the most important of all though?

    Haha sorry I'm pretty clueless about this, I never really gave too much thought to this kind of thing Tongue

    PDCAAS has essentially superseded PER, NPU etc. and it along with Biological Value are considered to be the definitive measures of protein quality.
    Logged

    I support PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals).

    The Truth About Saturated Fat
    danT
    Jr. Gnome
    *

    Reputation Power: 1
    danT is starting out.
    Posts: 59


    View Profile Awards
    « Reply #14 on: October 08, 2011, 02:43:54 PM »

    Great post. The percentage part really improves my understanding of BV.
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
    Print
    Jump to: