Ok guys well i respect your opinions, but i am talking from experience and results, as maybe you are. Also have a read of this
http://highlifeworkout.com/ scroll to the half naked chick. Next you will be telling me that this guy is wrong too, when he has a killer physique. Again this has worked best for me, but granted may not for another.
Your site doesn't prove your point.
This will prove mine:
Here are some peer-reviewed studies on meal frequency:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943985This study shows there was no difference in weight loss between subjects with high/low meal frequencies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9155494Evidence supports that meal frequency has nothing to do with energy in the subjects.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319656Yet again, no difference in energy in the subjects compared to 2 meals/d to 6 meals/d.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1905998Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Mar;45(3):161-9.Links
Influence of the feeding frequency on nutrient utilization in man: consequences for energy metabolism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319656Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Apr;25(4):519-28.Links
Compared with nibbling, neither gorging nor a morning fast affect short-term energy balance in obese patients in a chamber calorimeter.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053311Br J Nutr. 2008 Jun;99(6):1316-21. Epub 2007 Dec 6. Links
Acute effects on metabolism and appetite profile of one meal difference in the lower range of meal frequency.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1905998Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Mar;45(3):161-9.Links
Influence of the feeding frequency on nutrient utilization in man: consequences for energy metabolism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319656Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Apr;25(4):519-28.Links
Compared with nibbling, neither gorging nor a morning fast affect short-term energy balance in obese patients in a chamber calorimeter.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053311Br J Nutr. 2008 Jun;99(6):1316-21. Epub 2007 Dec 6. Links
Acute effects on metabolism and appetite profile of one meal difference in the lower range of meal frequency.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9155494Br J Nutr. 1997 Apr;77 Suppl 1:S57-70. Links
Meal frequency and energy balance.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15806828Forum Nutr. 2003;56:126-8.Links
Highlighting the positive impact of increasing feeding frequency on metabolism and weight management.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9504318Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Feb;22(2):105-12.Links
Evidence that eating frequency is inversely related to body weight status in male, but not female, non-obese adults reporting valid dietary intakes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15085170Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 May;28(5):653-60. Links
Decreased thermic effect of food after an irregular compared with a regular meal pattern in healthy lean women.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15220950Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jul;58(7):1071-7. Links
Regular meal frequency creates more appropriate insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles compared with irregular meal frequency in healthy lean women.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17228037Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):100-6. Links
Association of eating frequency with body fatness in pre- and postmenopausal women.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15640455Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jan;81(1):16-24. Links
Comment in:
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jan;81(1):3-4.
Beneficial metabolic effects of regular meal frequency on dietary thermogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and fasting lipid profiles in healthy obese women.
http://www.ajcn.org/content/90/5/1244.full(Source: bb.com)